Home
The French Polynesian Atolls Fundamentals of Reef Ecology The Tuamotu atoll Communities
Home     Glossary  
  Fluxes of Matter in the Tuamotu atolls Types of atoll and the Ecosystems Naturel Resources and their Management

Copra

Fishing

Pearl farming

Tourism

 

Organising the sector: a job well done

Benjamin Mathieu

One of the most successful initiatives to be jointly launched by the actors in the pearl production sector in order to prevent the further devaluation of cultured pearls was the creation of consortia called Economic Interest Groups (E.I.Gs). These are public and private structures which deal collectively with cultured pearl production problems and are responsible for organising the sales and marketing of pearls.

The E.I.G. called "Poe Rava Nui", the work of which is analysed below in detail, accounts for 10% of the whole Polynesian pearl output.

The E.I.G. called "Tahiti Pearl Producer", which was created in September 1995 by a few small and medium-sized producers, accounts for 8% of the total output. After "Poe Rava Nui", this consortium organised its first public auction sales in April 1996: the proceedings of these sales are analysed below.

The E.I.G. called "Perles de Tahiti", which includes representatives of the Territory and the two previously mentioned E.I.Gs, as well as the Professional pearl producers' Union (SPPP), to which 14 of the largest pearl producing companies (accounting for 60 % of the total output) belong, does not actually produce pearls, but has contributed importantly to promoting the pearl trade, as we will see in the third section

The beginnings of the restructuring process: the example of "Poe Rava Nui".

  • The first of a series of initiatives adopted by the "Poe Rava Nui" consortium to revive the Black Pearl market was taken in 1992, when a more selective pearl sales strategy was implemented. This strategy consisted of sorting out the pearls into batches of various qualities and distributing them selectively to the appropriate customers. This more discriminating approach to pearls helped from 1992 onwards to slow down the drop in the sales prices of pearls, and some poor-quality batches were even withdrawn.

    Graph no.6, in which the sales price of pearls set by "Poe Rava Nui" is compared with that applied to the output as a whole, shows what a difference these efforts made. The graph begins with the 1985 statistics, which were the first to become available for this consortium. No figures have been provided by "Poe Rava Nui" for the period from 1997 to 1999.

    Interpretation:
    Since 1988, the mean price per gramme of the pearls auctioned by this consortium
    has always been higher than the average rates, although the curve shows a consistently downward slope.
    The crisis which hit the sector in 1991 was not felt as strongly as elsewhere by this
    consortium, which sold its pearls for 4016 CFP in 1995, as compared with the sum of only 2187 CFP which was fetched by the overall pearl exports (1 FCFP=0.055FF).

    "Poe Rava Nui" had previously set itself a minimum sales price of 4000 CFP in 1993. Below this price, it was assumed that the productivity of the pearl fisheries would be at stake, but after  the Japanese crisis in 1995, this minimum was no longer maintained.

    The strategy consisting of sorting out the pearls depending on their quality turned out to be fruitful according to the director of the Group, although it involved a strict selection. In 1992, for example, 36% of all the pearls harvested were rejected as being unsuitable for sale, as compared with only 13.7% in 1991 and 8% in 1990.

    This policy was supported in 1994 by the Polynesian Government, which helped indirectly to raise the prices briefly that year. A new tax was levied on the basis of the weight of the pearls rather than their number, and this favoured the production of better-quality batches.

  • In parallel with its pearl selection policy, "Poe Rava Nui" made considerable efforts to encourage the production of  pearls of a higher quality in the atolls.

    This can be seen from the above analysis.

    A study based on the ratio between the number of pearls marketed between 1992 (when the first attempts to improve the value of pearls were made) and 1996 and the mean price of pearls per atoll fits the picture described above.

    Using a simple regression method, the correlations existing between Y, the number of pearls sold, and X, the mean annual sales price per pearl, were established for each of the atolls involved in the activities of "Poe Rava Nui.". This analysis was carried out for the key period 1992-1996.

    Graph no. 7 gives the regression line obtained for all the atolls involved in the activity of this E.I.G. during this period. The coefficient of correlation r obtained was 0.85, which is a fairly high value, since a value of 0.90  was taken to reflect a strong correlation, and a value of 0.50, a weak correlation.

    Graph no. 7b  was based on similar calculations, but the choice of atolls was different in this case, since only the first four (accounting for 55% of this Group's total pearl sales) and the last three in terms of the number of pearls sold during this period were included here. The correlation between the variables was even stronger here, since the coefficient of correlation r reached a value of 0.97.

    What conclusions can be drawn from this study?

    The policy adopted by "Poe Rava Nui" with a view to improving the quality of the pearl supply  by grading the pearls led to some of the output being withdrawn from the market. The atolls producing the most valuable pearls (those selling at around 8000 CFP each) were able to market their output more readily, and were therefore also those where the production increased most strongly, from 29% of the total output in 1991 to  56.6% in 1995. These atolls were Les Gambiers,  Hao and Makemo.

    Other atolls on the contrary, such as Ahe, Apataki and Kaukura, whose pearls were selling for less than 5000 CFP, accounted for only very small, decreasing proportions of the total market. In the case of Ahe, for example, the pearl sales amounted to 2.9% of the total sales figures in 1991, and dropped to only 1.5% in 1996.

The increasing popularity of auction sales.

All the above consortia, especially "Poe Rava Nui" and "Tahiti Pearl Producer", organise regular auction sales in Tahiti, which the leading local and international pearl traders are invited to attend.

  • The "Poe Rava Nui" auction sales

    Since 1977, "Poe Rava Nui" has been holding international auction sales every year in October. These sales relieve the pearl producers isolated in the atolls of the need to negotiate the sales prices themselves and enable them to benefit from the high reputation enjoyed by this consortium among the traders. The expenses involved in the sales, like the cost of running the Group itself, are covered mainly by the members' enrolment fees, which take the form of a fixed proportion of the auction sale proceeds.

    The results obtained at these auction sales year after year show what a successful attempt this initiative has been to organise the Tahitian pearl market and its suppliers and to improve the profits. In 1996, for example, 138 of the 152 batches up for sale went for a total sum of  464 million CFP.

    Over the years, the sales figures achieved by "Poe Rava Nui" have come to be regarded as the standard rates, in view the quality and the quantity of the pearls sold by this consortium. The international buyers have no hesitation in making the journey every year rather than keeping large stocks as they used to do until quite recently. The Group can therefore no longer restrict its sales activities to a single annual auction, and its  Board of Administrators has opened a sales department at the Group's Headquarters, in order to be able to satisfy its customers' requirements all year round.

     

  • The "Tahiti Pearl Producer" auction sales:

    The "Tahiti Pearl Producer" consortium, which is a more recently created structure, held its first auction sales in April 1996 at the Papeete Town Hall. Despite the financial crisis which was rocking South-Eastern Asia at the time, the Group's third annual event in 1998 was a great success. It was attended by 27 local companies and 43 companies from other parts of the world. In 1998, only 19 pearl producers belonged to "Tahiti Pearl Producer", however. This explains why  29 500 of the 75 000 pearls on sale came from the "Poe Rava Nui" consortium. In the end, 66 832 pearls sorted into 114 batches were purchased that year for the total sum of 400 million CFP.

    The final amounts auctioned that year amounted to 50.18%, as against  28% in 1996 and 22% in 1997.

These two consortia, "Poe Rava Nui" and "Tahiti Pearl Producer", have begun to co-operate more closely by inaugurating a third international annual auction sales event, the first of which was to be held in 2000. Auction sales are now being held every four months (in February, June and October).

It should not be forgotten, however, that the praiseworthy attempts incontestably made by the two consortia mentioned above to organise and improve the pearl production and trading practices involved only 10 to 15% of the whole sector, depending on the year under consideration.

The promotion of pearls successfully accomplished.

The role played by the " Perles de Tahiti" consortium

"Perles de Tahiti" was created in order to make the world-wide pearl promotion efforts which were badly needed at the time.

The first steps to be taken on these lines in 1994 were the setting up of an international sales promotion network to cover Japan, the United States, Switzerland and Hong-Kong. Since 1995, the Group has been publishing sales promotion brochures which are distributed in Europe, as well as a book, which was re-published in 1997, to which 24 of the world's finest jewellers contributed. In parallel, on the home ground, to encourage pearl producers and the population as a whole to engage in this new form of activity, this consortium has been publishing a newsletter, "Te Reko Parau", 1 000 copies of which are distributed throughout the Territory twice a month. The main headings to be found in this paper are: the pearl sales, pearl production, the reputation of Polynesian pearls, the competition, the markets and the media.

 "Perles de Tahiti" now also has its own international internet site  :

http://www.tahiti-blackpearls.com/introduction_fr/ . In 1997, this site was consulted by more than a thousand people a month on average. A pearl catalogue is available, which makes it possible to purchase pearls on-line.

This E.I.G. is financed by the subscriptions of the members of the profession and by the Territory, which contributes a fixed proportion of the pearl export taxes collected.

The main steps taken by this Group are all part of the overall plan to regulate and promote the Tahitian pearl trade.

Marketing strategies

  • The classification of pearls: towards a more standardised market.

    Tahitian pearls are now classified on the basis of a set of quality criteria as regards their size, shape, surface characteristics and lustre. This system became operative as from 1st.January 1999, after giving rise to much heated debate since 1994.

    Size :

    The size of a pearl is measured with a set of sieves, with mesh sizes increasing in 0.5-mm steps.

    Shape :

    The shape of a pearl is defined in terms of four categories: round pearls are denoted R (their diameter must vary by less than 2%), the semi-round ones, SR (variations ranging between 2% and 5%), the semi-baroque ones SB (those showing a minimum symmetry axis), the ringed ones CL (striated pearls with regular bands), and the baroque ones BQ (irregular pearls belonging to none of the above categories).

    Quality:

    The quality depends on the surface characteristics (on whether or not pores, marks, lumps, etc. can be detected). The sheen or lustre results from the light reflected by the polished surface of a pearl. It depends on the regularity, the thickness and the arrangement of the constitutive layers of nacre.

    Based on these criteria, pearls are assigned to one of the following categories:

    Quality A: faultless pearls with an exceptionally fine lustre.

    Quality B: pearls with a few defects on less than one third of their total surface.

    Qualities C and D: pearls with easily visible flaws, and those lacking lustre.

     

  • Quality labels.

    The terms defining the Original Registered Trademark were drawn up and approved in June 1998 by the Polynesian Assembly. On this occasion, the Black Polynesian Pearl, "keshi", and "mabe" were all officially named the "Tahiti cultured pearl".

    Consequently, all the pearl products entitled to use this registered name must originate from French Polynesia, and all the operations (oyster collecting, rearing and grafting) involved in their production must also have been carried out on the Territory. Any pearls in which the layers of nacre have not accumulated around at least  80% of the entire nucleus are classified as rejects unfit for export, as are calcite and organic pearls and are sold only on the "cheap imitation" market.
    The following conclusion was reached by the members of the Assembly: "Establishing target prices for the various categories of pearls seems to be a reasonable objective".

     

  • The new definition of the Tahitian pearl trader.  

    The "Tahitian pearl trader" has now been defined as " Any person or legal entity involved in the wholesale or semi-wholesale purchase of Tahitian cultured pearls with a view to  re-selling the latter to other persons who intend to use them for professional purposes". Since 1st. January 1999, it has been obligatory for these traders to obtain a "pearl trader's licence". These licences are delivered under the following conditions: applicants must be domiciled in Polynesia, and must provide proof of their professional status and financial security (by making a deposit or taking out insurance coverage, for example).

    Persons who have occupied administrative positions "closely connected to the pearl trade"  less than two years prior to the application are ineligible for the right to hold a licence.

    The pearl trader's licence is valid for two years and is renewable subject to re-examination of the applicant's credentials. Any persons breaching the law in this respect are liable to be fined.

    As the result of the popularity of these measures among professional circles, special Governmental sessions have been scheduled to take place regularly to deal with issues of this kind as from 2000.

Conclusion :

The commercial efforts described  above are in line with the objectives pursued by international trade organisations all over the world.

In 1994, the World Pearl Organization (WPO) recommended that all the pearl producing countries should take precautionary measures as regards the regulation of the wholesale trade, in particular. In 1997, the Tokyo headquarters of the Organization stressed the need to draw up an official pearl  classification scale.
The efforts made to organise the Polynesian pearl trade have had local benefits, since they have led to the creation of a professional network which is capable of fulfilling more specific pearl requirements, and this in turn is favouring the growth of employment  in the Territory. 

 

References sources :

Service des Ressources Marines. (1991-1996) Bulletin du secteur de la mer, Ministère de la mer, Polynésie française.

Mathieu B. (1998) Mémoire de maîtrise:"La perliculture peut-elle constituer un moteur de développement en Polynésie française".

update : 07/10/08

Search

Atoll_site_webmaster