|
The pearl
making
|
|
Pearl
production and marketing
|
|
Effects
of development on the Polynesian atolls
|
Organising
the sector: a job well done
One
of the most successful initiatives to be jointly launched by the
actors in the pearl production sector in order to prevent the
further devaluation of cultured pearls was the creation of consortia
called Economic Interest Groups (E.I.Gs). These are public and
private structures which deal collectively with cultured pearl
production problems and are responsible for organising the sales and
marketing of pearls.
The
E.I.G. called "Poe Rava Nui", the work of which is
analysed below in detail, accounts for 10% of the whole Polynesian
pearl output.
The
E.I.G. called "Tahiti Pearl Producer", which was created
in September 1995 by a few small and medium-sized producers,
accounts for 8% of the total output. After "Poe Rava Nui",
this consortium organised its first public auction sales in April
1996: the proceedings of these sales are analysed below.
The
E.I.G. called "Perles de Tahiti", which includes
representatives of the Territory and the two previously mentioned
E.I.Gs, as well as the Professional pearl producers' Union (SPPP),
to which 14 of the largest pearl producing companies (accounting for
60 % of the total output) belong, does not actually produce pearls,
but has contributed importantly to promoting the pearl trade, as we
will see in the third section
The
beginnings of the restructuring process: the example of "Poe
Rava Nui".
-
The
first of a series of initiatives adopted by the "Poe
Rava Nui" consortium to revive the Black Pearl market
was taken in 1992, when a more selective pearl sales
strategy was implemented. This strategy consisted of
sorting out the pearls into batches of various qualities
and distributing them selectively to the appropriate
customers. This more discriminating approach to pearls
helped from 1992 onwards to slow down the drop in the
sales prices of pearls, and some poor-quality batches were
even withdrawn.
Graph
no.6, in which the sales price of pearls set by
"Poe Rava Nui" is compared with that applied to
the output as a whole, shows what a difference these
efforts made. The graph begins with the 1985 statistics,
which were the first to become available for this
consortium. No figures have been provided by "Poe
Rava Nui" for the period from 1997 to 1999.
Interpretation:
Since 1988, the mean price per gramme of the pearls
auctioned by this consortium
has always been
higher than the average rates, although the curve shows a
consistently downward slope.
The crisis which hit the sector in 1991 was not felt as
strongly as elsewhere by this consortium,
which sold its pearls for
4016 CFP in 1995, as compared with the sum of only
2187 CFP which was fetched by the overall pearl exports (1
FCFP=0.055FF).
"Poe
Rava Nui" had previously set itself a minimum sales
price of 4000 CFP in 1993. Below this price, it was
assumed that the productivity of the pearl fisheries would
be at stake, but after
the Japanese crisis in 1995, this minimum was no
longer maintained.
The
strategy consisting of sorting out the pearls depending on
their quality turned out to be fruitful according to the
director of the Group, although it involved a strict
selection. In 1992, for example, 36% of all the pearls
harvested were rejected as being unsuitable for sale, as
compared with only 13.7% in 1991 and 8% in 1990.
This
policy was supported in 1994 by the Polynesian Government,
which helped indirectly to raise the prices briefly that
year. A new tax was levied on the basis of the weight of
the pearls rather than their number, and this favoured the
production of better-quality batches.
-
In
parallel with its pearl selection policy, "Poe Rava
Nui" made considerable efforts to encourage the
production of pearls
of a higher quality in the atolls.
This
can be seen from the above analysis.
A
study based on the ratio between the number of pearls
marketed between 1992 (when the first attempts to improve
the value of pearls were made) and 1996 and the mean price
of pearls per atoll fits the picture described above.
Using
a simple regression method, the correlations existing
between Y, the number of pearls sold, and X, the mean
annual sales price per pearl, were established for each of
the atolls involved in the activities of "Poe Rava
Nui.". This analysis was carried out for the key
period 1992-1996.
Graph
no. 7 gives the regression line obtained for all the atolls
involved in the activity of this
E.I.G. during this period.
The coefficient of correlation r obtained was 0.85, which
is a fairly high value, since a value of 0.90
was taken to reflect a strong correlation, and a
value of 0.50, a weak correlation.
Graph
no. 7b was based on similar calculations, but the
choice of atolls was different in this case, since only
the first four (accounting for 55% of this Group's
total pearl sales)
and the last three in terms of the number of pearls sold
during this period were included here. The correlation
between the variables was even stronger here, since the
coefficient of correlation r reached a value of 0.97.
What
conclusions can be drawn from this study?
The
policy adopted by "Poe Rava Nui" with a view to
improving the quality of the pearl supply by grading the pearls led to some of the output being
withdrawn from the market. The atolls producing the most
valuable pearls (those selling at around 8000 CFP each)
were able to market their output more readily, and were
therefore also those where the production increased most
strongly, from 29% of the total output in 1991 to
56.6% in 1995. These atolls were Les Gambiers,
Hao and Makemo.
Other
atolls on the contrary, such as Ahe, Apataki and Kaukura,
whose pearls were selling for less than 5000 CFP,
accounted for only very small, decreasing proportions of
the total market. In the case of Ahe, for example, the
pearl sales amounted to 2.9% of the total sales figures in
1991, and dropped to only 1.5% in 1996.
|
|
|
The
increasing popularity of auction sales.
|
All the above consortia, especially "Poe Rava
Nui" and "Tahiti Pearl Producer", organise
regular auction sales in Tahiti, which the leading local and
international pearl traders are invited to attend.
-
The "Poe Rava Nui" auction sales:
Since 1977, "Poe Rava Nui" has been holding
international auction sales every year in October. These
sales relieve the pearl producers isolated in the atolls
of the need to negotiate the sales prices themselves and
enable them to benefit from the high reputation enjoyed by
this consortium among the traders. The expenses involved
in the sales, like the cost of running the Group itself,
are covered mainly by the members' enrolment fees, which
take the form of a fixed proportion of the auction sale
proceeds.
The results obtained at these auction sales year after
year show what a successful attempt this initiative has
been to organise the Tahitian pearl market and its
suppliers and to improve the profits. In 1996, for example,
138 of the 152 batches up for sale went for a total sum of
464 million CFP.
Over the years, the sales figures achieved by
"Poe Rava Nui" have come to be regarded as the
standard rates, in view the quality and the quantity of
the pearls sold by this consortium. The international
buyers have no hesitation in making the journey every year
rather than keeping large stocks as they used to do until
quite recently. The Group can therefore no longer restrict
its sales activities to a single annual auction, and its
Board of Administrators has opened a sales
department at the Group's Headquarters, in order to be
able to satisfy its customers' requirements all year
round.
-
The "Tahiti Pearl Producer" auction sales:
The "Tahiti Pearl Producer" consortium,
which is a more recently created structure, held its first
auction sales in April 1996 at the Papeete Town Hall.
Despite the financial crisis which was rocking
South-Eastern Asia at the time, the Group's third annual
event in 1998 was a great success. It was attended by 27
local companies and 43 companies from other parts of the
world. In 1998, only 19 pearl producers belonged to
"Tahiti Pearl Producer", however. This explains
why 29 500 of
the 75 000 pearls on sale came from the "Poe Rava
Nui" consortium. In the end, 66 832 pearls sorted
into 114 batches were purchased that year for the total
sum of 400 million CFP.
The final amounts auctioned that year amounted to 50.18%, as against
28% in 1996 and 22% in 1997.
These
two consortia, "Poe Rava Nui" and "Tahiti Pearl
Producer", have begun to co-operate more closely by
inaugurating a third international annual auction sales event,
the first of which was to be held in 2000.
Auction sales are now being held every four months (in
February, June and October).
It should not be forgotten, however, that the praiseworthy
attempts incontestably made by the two consortia mentioned
above to organise and improve the pearl production and trading
practices involved only 10 to 15% of the whole sector,
depending on the year under consideration. | |
The
promotion of pearls successfully accomplished.
|
The
role played by the " Perles de Tahiti" consortium
"Perles
de Tahiti" was created in order to make the world-wide
pearl promotion efforts which were badly needed at the time.
The
first steps to be taken on these lines in 1994 were the
setting up of an international sales promotion network to
cover Japan, the United States, Switzerland and Hong-Kong.
Since 1995, the Group has been publishing sales promotion
brochures which are distributed in Europe, as well as a book,
which was re-published in 1997, to which 24 of the world's
finest jewellers contributed. In parallel, on the home ground,
to encourage pearl producers and the population as a whole to
engage in this new form of activity, this consortium has been
publishing a newsletter, "Te
Reko Parau",
1 000 copies of which are distributed throughout the Territory
twice a month. The main headings to be found in this paper
are: the pearl sales, pearl production, the reputation of
Polynesian pearls, the competition, the markets and the media.
"Perles
de Tahiti" now also has its own international internet
site :
http://www.tahiti-blackpearls.com/introduction_fr/
. In 1997, this site was consulted by more than a thousand
people a month on average. A pearl catalogue is available,
which makes it possible to purchase pearls on-line.
This
E.I.G. is financed by the subscriptions of the members of the
profession and by the Territory, which contributes a fixed
proportion of the pearl export taxes collected.
The
main steps taken by this Group are all part of the overall
plan to regulate and promote the Tahitian pearl trade.
Marketing
strategies
-
The
classification of pearls: towards a more standardised
market.
Tahitian
pearls are now classified on the basis of a set of quality
criteria as regards their size, shape, surface
characteristics and lustre. This system became operative
as from 1st.January 1999, after giving rise to much heated
debate since 1994.
Size
:
The
size of a pearl is measured with a set of sieves, with
mesh sizes increasing in 0.5-mm steps.
Shape
:
The
shape of a pearl is defined in terms of four categories:
round pearls are denoted R (their diameter must vary by
less than 2%), the semi-round ones, SR (variations ranging
between 2% and 5%), the semi-baroque ones SB (those
showing a minimum symmetry axis), the ringed ones CL (striated
pearls with regular bands), and the baroque ones BQ (irregular
pearls belonging to none of the above categories).
Quality:
The
quality depends on the surface characteristics (on whether
or not pores, marks, lumps, etc. can be detected). The
sheen or lustre results from the light reflected by the
polished surface of a pearl. It depends on the regularity,
the thickness and the arrangement of the constitutive
layers of nacre.
Based
on these criteria, pearls are assigned to one of the
following categories:
Quality
A: faultless pearls with an exceptionally fine lustre.
Quality
B: pearls with a few defects on less than one third of
their total surface.
Qualities
C and D: pearls with easily visible flaws, and those
lacking lustre.
-
Quality
labels.
The
terms defining the Original Registered Trademark were
drawn up and approved in June 1998 by the Polynesian
Assembly. On this occasion, the Black Polynesian Pearl,
"keshi", and "mabe" were all
officially named the "Tahiti cultured pearl".
Consequently,
all the pearl products entitled to use this registered
name must originate from French Polynesia, and all the
operations (oyster collecting, rearing and grafting)
involved in their production must also have been carried
out on the Territory. Any pearls in which the layers of
nacre have not accumulated around at least
80% of the entire nucleus are classified as rejects
unfit for export, as are calcite and organic pearls and are sold only on the "cheap
imitation" market.
The following conclusion was reached by the members of the
Assembly: "Establishing target prices for the various
categories of pearls seems to be a reasonable
objective".
-
The
new definition of the Tahitian pearl trader.
The
"Tahitian pearl trader" has now been defined as
" Any person or legal entity involved in the
wholesale or semi-wholesale purchase of Tahitian cultured
pearls with a view to
re-selling the latter to other persons who intend
to use them for professional purposes". Since 1st.
January 1999, it has been obligatory for these traders to
obtain a "pearl trader's licence". These
licences are delivered under the following conditions:
applicants must be domiciled in Polynesia, and must
provide proof of their professional status and financial
security (by making a deposit or taking out insurance
coverage, for example).
Persons
who have occupied administrative positions "closely
connected to the pearl trade"
less than two years prior to the application are
ineligible for the right to hold a licence.
The
pearl trader's licence is valid for two years and is
renewable subject to re-examination of the applicant's
credentials. Any persons breaching the law in this respect
are liable to be fined.
As
the result of the popularity of these measures among
professional circles, special Governmental sessions have
been scheduled to take place regularly to deal with issues
of this kind as from 2000.
Conclusion
:
The
commercial efforts described
above are in line with the objectives pursued by
international trade organisations all over the world.
In
1994, the World Pearl Organization (WPO) recommended that
all the pearl producing countries should take precautionary
measures as regards the regulation of the wholesale trade, in
particular. In 1997, the Tokyo headquarters of the
Organization stressed the need to draw up an official pearl
classification scale.
The efforts made to organise the Polynesian pearl trade have
had local benefits, since they have led to the creation of a
professional network which is capable of fulfilling more
specific pearl requirements, and this in turn is favouring the
growth of employment in
the Territory. |
References
sources :
Service des Ressources Marines. (1991-1996)
Bulletin du secteur de la mer, Ministère de la mer, Polynésie
française.
Mathieu B. (1998) Mémoire de
maîtrise:"La perliculture peut-elle constituer un moteur de
développement en Polynésie française".
|

|